Rainwater harvesting, once reliable, fails amid prolonged droughts. Meanwhile, seasonal migration for work, which was once a temporary fix, is becoming permanent displacement for these people at the margins. Their valiant attempts to diversify livelihoods through craftwork, small-scale trade, or agroforestry have uncertain returns due to a shrinking resource base and the volatile nature of markets.

This is where locally-led adaptation (LLA) matters—not as a policy buzzword but as a lived reality. LLA flips the usual development paradigm. Instead of experts designing solutions in conference rooms, it puts communities at the center because they understand their land better than any outsider ever could. And then let the stakeholders pick the right strategy, including financial support.

Globally, this approach is gaining ground. In Vietnam, CARE restored mangroves by establishing community-based mangrove management boards that coordinated planning and planting activities at the community level. In the USA, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) funds tribal governments to develop climate adaptation plans rooted in Indigenous knowledge and priorities. In Australia, Aboriginal ranger groups combine ancient fire management practices with modern science to manage their lands with fire.

We need not look far. In Nagaland, the Chakhesang tribe restored soil fertility, sustained water availability, and tripled crop yields through the adoption of the Zabo system. Zabo is a century-old indigenous integrated farming method that combines water harvesting, forestry, animal husbandry, and agriculture.

There are a few other experiments led by non-tribal communities that bear some important lessons for mainstreaming LLA for climate action. One such noteworthy example is from Gujarat, where women used the Bhungroo water management system to combat seasonal waterlogging and severe droughts. This system stores floodwater underground and releases it during dry periods. To maximise farm productivity, they planted climate-resilient crops and applied modern irrigation techniques. On the social side, this intervention enabled female farmers to lead adaptation efforts and gain economic independence.

In another effort, the Government of Uttar Pradesh has developed action plans for 43 ‘Climate Smart’ Gram Panchayats (GPs), identified through a multi-criteria assessment in highly vulnerable districts. To take this to the national level, Niti Aayog is running an ongoing program with Vasudha Foundation.

Similarly, KILA (Kerala Institute of Local Administration) has supported local governments in Kerala to develop and implement Local Action Plans on Climate Change (LAPCCs)- which are blueprints for communities to tackle climate change challenges and transition towards sustainable and resilient futures.

These examples worked because they respected indigenous knowledge and practices and gave locals the tools, voice, and flexibility to adapt that knowledge to new threats. Replicating such success stories is not easy, but the moment is ripe. The Government of India’s INR 24,000 crore PM JANMAN program is a great opportunity to scale this approach. The program focuses on the socioeconomic development of 75 particularly vulnerable tribal groups (PVTG) across the country.

What makes efforts like JANMAN, Climate-smart GPs, LAPCC and other examples illustrated here different is that they signal a shift from doing things for local communities to doing things with them. While some of them work directly with the community, others work through the local institutions like GPs.

And the early signs are promising: The program adopts inclusive decision-making, community-driven planning, local capacity-building, flexibility and learning. However, the test lies in its execution. If these programs can integrate the locally led adaptation approaches, using local institutions like GPs as levers, it could transform the resilience of the local communities to climate change.

The blog was first published on Firstpost on 22nd April, 2025