While the pandemic barely affected some FinTechs in Vietnam, such as e-commerce and online food delivery firms, others were hit hard. Early-stage start-ups struggled as funding from banks and investors dried up.
This report highlights the impact of COVID-19 on the operations, revenue, and coping strategies of FinTechs in Vietnam. It explores investor sentiments and the impact of government policies on the development of FinTechs in the country. The report further provides recommendations for relevant stakeholders to help affected FinTechs recover.
Vaccine hesitancy can jeopardize India’s plan to defeat COVID-19 as it scrambles to vaccinate its population in the wake of the second wave of the disease. While the second wave seems to be receding, the possibility of an intense third wave looms large. The fear of a third wave is real because the rate of vaccination has been slow, the possibility of more virulent strains of the virus emerging is high, and the need to reopen economic activity is critical—though it may lead to people adopting COVID-inappropriate behavior, as seen from our studies in the past.
In this situation, the best possible solution to mitigate the risk of a third wave is to quickly vaccinate as many people as possible to break the chain of transmission and reduce fatalities. Enforcing COVID-appropriate behavior and building the capacity of the health system has to continue in parallel.
Currently, progress in vaccination has been slow because of an imbalance in supply and demand. However, as per the plans released by the Government of India, vaccine supply should normalize by July-Aug 2021. The plan is to have more than 2 billion vaccine doses by Dec, 2021, which is enough to vaccinate the eligible population. The availability of vaccines has to be complemented with a massive ramping up of the supply chain, vaccination centers, and healthcare staff to distribute and administer the vaccine. Even if availability, distribution, and administration of the vaccines are sorted, achieving complete vaccination of the eligible population by Dec, 2021 is a daunting task. And the reluctance of people to get a shot in their arms, or vaccine hesitancy, remains a key factor that can jeopardize the plan.
For example, in the USA, the seven-day trailing average of vaccination has dropped from the peak of 3.7 million a day in mid-April to less than a million per day toward the beginning of June, 2021. About 41% of the population is fully vaccinated and 51% have received at least one dose—a large part of the population remains unvaccinated. This is primarily due to vaccine hesitancy and it is almost certain that India will face this issue as the availability increases.
A three-pronged approach that combines interventions from both demand and supply sides is needed to manage vaccine hesitancy. Information, Education and Communication (IEC) is the most important “prong” in the approach to reduce vaccine hesitancy. It can be even more effective if coupled with the other prongs of incentives and an efficient supply chain. The following table provides a list of ideas across these three elements to manage vaccine hesitancy.
The following table provides a list of ideas across these three elements to manage vaccine hesitancy.
Frontline workers: People-to-people awareness campaigns can be launched that utilize frontline workers like ASHAs, Anganwadi workers (AWWs), and auxiliary nursing midwives (ANMs). The frontline workers can either reach the eligible candidates or specific target groups directly to motivate and track them. Mechanisms for supportive supervision and monitoring may be set up.
Last-mile service delivery points: Campaigns can also be launched through the vast networks of citizen-facing outlets developed to deliver products and services to the rural population, such as Citizen Services Centres (CSCs), Public Distribution System (PDS) dealers, fertilizer dealers, and self-help groups, among others. MGNREGA work sites can also be used for this purpose.
Through reminders and telephone calls: Health personnel like Community Health Officers (CHOs), Block Community Process Managers (BCPMs), and ANMs may be deployed to speak to hesitant clients through phone calls to motivate and convince them to get vaccinated.
Through community influencers: Community influences like religious and community leaders, gram pradhans, panch, and ward members, among others, may be identified and engaged with. They can play a critical role in influencing the vaccine-hesitant group.
Above-the-line IEC channels
Regular activities that explain the importance of vaccination, its safety, efficacy, and possible side effects need to be initiated and increased. Such activities, including social media campaigns, mass media campaigns, informative caller tones particularly voiced or fronted by a famous non-controversial celebrity like sports personality or film stars, wall paintings, and hoardings could prove vital in dealing with misinformation and influencing the decisions of people to get vaccinated. A lot of action is already happening through ATL channels but it needs to increase as we vaccinate early adopters and start to target hesitant population.
Incentives
Incentives can play a key role in motivating people to take vaccines. These may be in the form of financial incentives or non-financial incentives.
Financial incentives: One form of financial incentive can be DBT cash transfers to the households if all the eligible members get vaccinated. It can generate healthy competition among the residents of an area or community to take up vaccination.
A lottery system could also be tried where every vaccinated person is eligible for a lucky draw once that area, block, or district reaches a certain threshold of vaccination. A few big prizes can be announced to motivate people to participate in it. FLWs could also be incentivized to get their eligible catchment population vaccinated. Grampanchayats could also be incentivized to motivate people in their jurisdiction to get vaccinated.
Non-financial incentives- Food packets or other goods can be provided if all members of a house are vaccinated. This may be a top-up to the already sanctioned quantity of ration through PDS. Another way could be by recognizing those households as “Adarsh” (ideal) houses, where all the eligible members are vaccinated. These households can be felicitated by the local administration with a certificate, sticker, badge, or similar token.
Mandatory vaccination status for non-essential events that attract attention can also be tried as positive reinforcement for vaccination. Such events include entering famous places of worship, unrestricted air/train/road travel, entry in sport stadiums, gyms, swimming pools, conducting functions like weddings, and holding political gatherings only when organizers are vaccinated, among others.
Supply chain
The availability of vaccine doses and its easy accessibility play a critical role in influencing the issues related to complacency and convenience, and in turn affect vaccine hesitancy.
Ensure sufficient doses of vaccines
As per the National Health Authority, the demand-supply gap in COVID-19 vaccines stood at 6.5:1 at the time of writing, falling from an earlier gap of 11:1. While a lot of work needs to be done to bridge this gap, a strong pipeline of potential vaccine candidates and enhanced vaccine production in the country suggest the gap is set to reduce further.
Access near the community
The government may utilize the existing Universal Immunization Programme (UIP), where ANMs conduct regular vaccination sessions at pre-designated places in the community, such as health sub-centers, Anganwadi centers, and Panchayat Bhawans. In addition, the newly developed health and wellness centers along with their staff could be utilized to augment the vaccination drive. Drive-through vaccination centers may be considered to improve access and visibility.
Registration on the CoWIN portal
People in the age group of 18-45 years have found it difficult to get registered on the CoWIN portal primarily due to two reasons—the limited availability of slots and the limited number of individuals who use phones. As per the TRAI’s press release for May, 2021, the overall teledensity of India was 85.78%, while the rural teledensity was 59.28%. The teledensity numbers for states like Bihar and UP are in stark contrast to more urbanized states like Delhi. Even those who have phones may not necessarily have smartphones and are often unfamiliar with technology. This puts a considerable proportion of the population directly at a disadvantage. Network issues also act as a deterrent. The problem of slots will be resolved once the availability of vaccine doses improves.
To give equal opportunity to all for registration, the government may consider allowing on-site registration for eligible populations. Stakeholders can also utilize alternate channels like self-help groups, PDS shops, fertilizer dealers, and common service centers apart from routine healthcare frontline workers like ASHAs, ANMs, and AWWS, among others.
This video summarizes our series of publications on the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), an initiative of the Government of India to secure livelihoods in rural areas. It offers a quick yet comprehensive picture of MGNREGA and examines the sudden surge in demand for work under the program due to COVID-19. The video also highlights accomplishments of the program, challenges in the present system, and lessons from India’s experience with MGNREGA for other countries.
The Public Distribution System (PDS) run by the Government of India provides food security to about 810 million individuals by distributing more than 4 million metric tons of food grains every month. During the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdown, the government doubled the food grain entitlement of beneficiaries for the first eight months. To distribute the food grains, the central and state governments relied on their established and extensive technology-enabled logistical network with the help of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and state food corporations. This network allowed officials to keep track of the movement and distribution of food grains in real time. At the last mile, that is, the Fair Price Shops (FPS) or ration shops, the FPS owners with the support from state governments followed safety measures while distributing food grains to the beneficiaries. This enormous task was possible due to a combination of initiatives undertaken by the central and state governments, such as digitization of the supply chain and beneficiary database, improvement in storage and transportation infrastructure, and improved monitoring aided by technology.
According to India’s most recent census conducted in 2011, the country is home to 456 million migrants who represent 38% of the total population. The first lockdown to curb the spread of COVID-19 left these migrants stranded in their host communities and desperate to return to their familial homes.[1] Stories of households that lost livelihoods and families that walked hundreds of kilometers to reach their villages dominated the news. Even after reaching their native homes, the dearth of employment opportunities in villages offered migrants little solace.
MSC (MicroSave Consulting) undertook a mixed-method study[2] to understand the impact of COVID-19 on the earnings of low-income households and evaluate the government’s COVID-19 relief package, Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY). We conducted the first phase of the study during the three-month complete lockdown in May, 2020 and the second phase after the relaxation in lockdown norms in September, 2020. The studies covered 5,081 households across 18 states and union territories in each phase, with 4,082 households common to both rounds.
The effect of the pandemic on income and employment
In the first phase of MSC’s study, households across all occupations reported a drop in household income. Chart 1 illustrates the impact of the lockdown on the income of those surveyed. The impact was much more pronounced in May as compared to September, 2020. In May, 82% of households reported a reduction in income.
In September, 2020, MSC asked respondents whether they noticed any change in household income compared to the months of complete lockdown. Their responses are illustrated in Chart 2. 16% reported an increase in income while 10% said they regained employment once the lockdown restrictions were eased. This indicates that conditions had begun to return to normal.
When asked about their status of employment, the responses corroborated the findings mentioned above. In Round 1, 13% of households reported losing their jobs during the lockdown. This percentage fell to 3% in Round 2 and 10% of the households stated that they regained employment.
Due to loss of income, most families had to find other ways to sustain themselves. Many households reported that government benefits helped them stay afloat.
Households reported that circumstances forced them to take loans either from friends and family or from informal money lenders. They repurposed existing loans from self-help groups, banks, and microfinance institutions to manage expenses. People also reported positive experiences with their landlords or money lenders who agreed to delay or forgo rents and interest during the lockdown.
The pandemic had manifold impacts on migrants who depend on daily wages to survive and support their families. These migrants typically work as wage laborers in various industries. The shutdown of these industries due to the lockdown left migrants without any income, which made it difficult for them to pay for food or rent. The Government of India (GoI) did not issue any guidelines to mandate these industries to provide laborers with accommodation or food.
To mitigate the adverse impact on income, GoI launched various government-to-citizen (G2C) payments and in-kind assistance under the umbrella of the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY). The Finance Minister also announced that the government would allocate USD 468 million (INR 35 billion) to feed stranded migrants. The government further arranged Shramik trains to take migrants back to their native homes. Additionally, in June, 2020, the GoI launched the Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyan across 116 districts in the states of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, and Odisha to boost employment and livelihood opportunities. This program, with a total expenditure of about USD 5.6 billion (INR 392.93 billion), generated 507,868,671 person-days of employment between March and July, 2020. MSC assessed the impact of all programs under PMGKY and made recommendations on the way forward for each program to shoulder future crises in a series of publications.[3]
The next blog in this series examines the impact of increased allocation to the MNREGA[4] program as part of the GoI’s efforts to support returning migrants by commissioning public works in their villages.
[1] Details of the effect of the pandemic and lockdown on migrants can be found here.
[3] MSC has a series of publications on the impact of the various programs under PMGKY—PDS, PMUY, and MGNREGA, as well as other cash transfer programs—NSAP, PMJDY and PM Kisan.
[4] MGNREGA (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act) is a social security program of the GoI that guarantees at least 100 days of employment per year to unemployed, low-skilled workers.
As part of the relief measures announced by the Indian government to combat the COVID-19 crisis, 80 million poor women received cash transfers to purchase liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). This paper analyzes the program’s performance and the experience of beneficiaries while purchasing LPG refills from the money disbursed during and after the lockdown.
This site uses cookies, by continuing your navigation, you agree with our Cookie Policy.